/
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
They often can be identified by the use of words such as expect, may, could, intend, project, estimate, believe or anticipate or words of similar import. Actual results may differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statement.
$78.10
$0.10 (-0.13%)
EOD Sep 15, 2026
Financial stocks carry unique risks (credit cycles, regulatory changes, interest rate sensitivity) that aren't captured by standard quality metrics.
11.5x earnings. In line with financial-sector norms. The question is whether the current credit environment supports sustained earnings at this level.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue
N/A
Net Income (TTM)
$81M
▲ +67.5% YoY
Net Margin
—
P/E
11.5x
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$6.13B
Equity
$655M
Total Debt
$216M
Cash & Equiv.
$97M
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 6 May 2026, covering the period ending 31 Mar 2026, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 28 Jul 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 15 Sept 2026. Fiscal year ends Dec. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
At a P/E of 11.5 and a price-to-free-cash-flow of 10.6, First Financial (THFF) trades below a two-stage DCF intrinsic value of about $215.51 per share, so at $78.10 the stock looks undervalued (175.9% below estimated intrinsic value). A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, First Financial scores 64/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a solid business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 2.7%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Intrinsiqq's two-stage DCF estimates an intrinsic value of about $215.51 per share for THFF, projecting its recent free cash flow forward with a growth rate that fades toward a long-run rate and discounting it back to today. Applying a 25% margin of safety gives a more conservative fair-value entry around $161.63. At today's $78.10, that puts the stock about 175.9% below estimated intrinsic value. The result is sensitive to the growth and discount-rate inputs, so it is best to run conservative, base and optimistic cases. You can adjust all of them yourself with the sliders on the DCF tab.
First Financial scores 64 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a solid business on these measures. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, First Financial pays a regular dividend of about $2.09 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 2.7% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 30.7% of earnings, so the dividend is amply covered by earnings. First Financial has grown the dividend at roughly 14.3% a year over the past few years. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For THFF's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. THFF currently trades below its estimated intrinsic value and scores 64/100 on quality (solid). It also yields about 2.7%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.