/
Unless the context requires otherwise, references to Fold, we, us, or our and the "Company in this section are to the business and operations of Fold Holdings, Inc. after the closing of the Merger and to the business and operations of Fold, Inc. prior to the closing of the Merger (as such term is defined below). Company Overview Founded in 2019, Fold is a bitcoin-focused financial services comp…
$0.38
$0.01 (-2.56%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The institution is unprofitable. This typically signals severe credit losses or a business in transition.
Revenue grew 33.9% YoY.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$30M
▲ +33.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$50M
▼ -6.9% YoY
Net Margin
-164.63%
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$78M
Equity
$36M
Total Debt
$0.00
Cash & Equiv.
$12M
Continue Research
Fold Holdings (FLD)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Fold Holdings scores 55/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Fold Holdings scores 55 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FLD's valuation and scores 55/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.