/
Nakamoto Inc., a Delaware corporation, is a Bitcoin company building a global portfolio of Bitcoin-native companies. We hold Bitcoin on our balance sheet and, through our ecosystem-wide presence, seek to provide investors with exposure to Bitcoin s global growth and to leverage our treasury to acquire and develop an ecosystem of Bitcoin companies across finance, media, advisory and more.
$4.65
+$0.59 (+14.53%)
Live · 07:54 PM
The institution is unprofitable. This typically signals severe credit losses or a business in transition.
Revenue declined 33.0% YoY. For a bank, this often signals contracting loan book or reduced fee income.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$3M
▼ -33.0% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$290M
▼ -1343.7% YoY
Net Margin
-10180.30%
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$621M
Equity
$367M
Total Debt
$210M
Cash & Equiv.
$35M
Continue Research
Nakamoto (NAKA)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Nakamoto scores 40/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Nakamoto scores 40 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -11,314.3% operating margin and a -51.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh NAKA's valuation and scores 40/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.