Loading stockRelated stocks: Services-Amusement & Recreation Services
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Background We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in August 2023 as Sportech City USA, Corp, and changed our name to Nomadar Corp. in December 2023 ( Nomadar or the Company ). Sportech is a wholly-owned subsidiary of C diz Club de F tbol, S.A.D., a Spanish professional soccer club based in C diz, Andalusia ( C diz CF ) that competes in Campeonato Nacional de Liga de Segunda Divisi n, bet…
$2.98
$0.08 (-2.61%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-42213.06% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue declined 20.5% YoY. Margins deteriorated 25199.2pp alongside, both lines moving the wrong way.
Operating margin contracted 25199.2pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$6K
▼ -20.5% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$4M
▼ -101.6% YoY
Op. Margin
-42213.06%
▼ -25199.2pp YoY
ROIC
-44.30%
▲ +176.4pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (FY)
-$937K
▼ -87.4% YoY
Net Debt
-$207K
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$2M
Continue Research
Nomadar (NOMA)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Nomadar scores 10/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Nomadar scores 10 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -42,213.1% operating margin and a -44.3% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh NOMA's valuation and scores 10/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.