/
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Company Overview We were incorporated under the name Plasma Innovative Inc. on July 22, 2021 an emerging cold plasma application company. We intended to use our proprietary, cold plasma technology to treat crops and plant seeds for agriculture.
$1.79
+$0.00 (+0.00%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-29.95% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue declined 64.9% YoY. Margins deteriorated 37.8pp alongside, both lines moving the wrong way.
Free cash flow declined 109% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened. ROIC dropped from 23.00% to -16.44%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$8M
▼ -64.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$2M
▼ -306.1% YoY
Op. Margin
-29.95%
▼ -37.8pp YoY
ROIC
-15.07%
▼ -39.4pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (FY)
-$77K
▼ -108.9% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$1M
▼ -93.5% YoY
Net Debt
$7M
Cash & Equiv.
$206K
Continue Research
Esg (ESGH)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Esg scores 6/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 4.6%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Esg scores 6 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -30.0% operating margin and a -15.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, Esg pays a regular dividend of about $0.08 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 4.6% at the current price. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For ESGH's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh ESGH's valuation and scores 6/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 4.6%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.