/
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Electric & other services combined company · MN · FY ends Dec · Revenue $14.62B · 19.08% margin · -$7.69B FCF
$78.20
$0.03 (-0.04%)
EOD Jul 31, 2026
17.61% operating margin is respectable but not wide. ROIC at 3.73%. Suggests the business covers its cost of capital, but doesn't point to a wide moat.
Revenue grew 9.1%, steady but not accelerating.
Negative free cash flow of -$6.83B. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
21.4x earnings. Valuation is in a reasonable range. The main question is whether the business can re-accelerate or if current trajectory is already priced in.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$14.62B
▲ +9.1% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$2.23B
▲ +4.2% YoY
Op. Margin
19.08%
▼ -0.1pp YoY
ROIC
3.57%
▼ -0.2pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$7.69B
▼ -150.6% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$4.77B
▼ -12.0% YoY
Net Debt
$40.64B
Cash & Equiv.
$2.01B
5Y CAGR: +4.9%
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026, covering the period ending 30 Jun 2026, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 3 Aug 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 31 Jul 2026. Fiscal year ends Dec. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
At a P/E of 21.4, A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in .
On quality, Xcel Energy scores 23/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 2.8%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Xcel Energy scores 23 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 19.1% operating margin and a 3.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, Xcel Energy pays a regular dividend of about $2.18 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 2.8% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 61.1% of earnings, so the dividend is well covered. Xcel Energy has grown the dividend at roughly 8.2% a year over the past few years. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For XEL's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh XEL's valuation and scores 23/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 2.8%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.