The United States Oil Fund, LP ( USO ) is a Delaware limited partnership organized on May 12, 2005. USO is a commodity pool that issues limited partnership interests ( shares ) traded on the NYSE Arca, Inc. (the NYSE Arca ).
$125.57
+$1.61 (+1.30%)
Live · 07:54 PM
Revenue declined 124.2% YoY. For a bank, this often signals contracting loan book or reduced fee income.
At 26x earnings, the multiple is above the banking sector average. Financials rarely sustain elevated multiples through credit cycles. Net income declined 129% YoY, profitability momentum has weakened.
26.5x earnings. Above the financial-sector median (~13x). The market is pricing in above-average returns or growth, any credit deterioration would compress the multiple quickly.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$888M
▼ -124.2% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$879M
▼ -129.2% YoY
Net Margin
98.99%
P/E
26.5x
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$2.74B
Equity
N/A
Total Debt
$0.00
Cash & Equiv.
$1.96B
Continue Research
At a P/E of 26.5, United States Oil Fund, LP (USO)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, United States Oil Fund, LP scores 32/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
United States Oil Fund, LP scores 32 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh USO's valuation and scores 32/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.