Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
/
Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Dreamland Limited is a Hong Kong-based event management service provider specializing in the organization, planning, promotion, and management of themed touring walk-through experience events. The company focuses on creating immersive, character-driven experiences for intellectual property owners of licensed characters from well-publicized animated cartoons and live-action theatrical motion pictures. Dreamland assists event organizers throughout the entire event lifecycle, from initial planning and promotional activities to on-site management of these themed experiences. The company complements its core event management services with merchandise design and sales activities, including items sold at venues and promotional merchandise. Operating in both Hong Kong and overseas markets, Dreamland positions itself at the intersection of experiential marketing, event management, and character-based intellectual property promotion. The company's business model enables IP owners and event organizers to effectively connect licensed brands and characters with target audiences through organized live experiences. Founded in 2016, Dreamland Limited trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market as a foreign private issuer.
$2.63
+$0.08 (+3.14%)
EOD Aug 21, 2026
Operating margin is thin at 1.93%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue grew 124.1%, still solid. Margins contracted 37.8pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
At 99x earnings, the current multiple leaves limited room for execution misses or growth deceleration. Free cash flow declined 410% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened.
99.5x earnings. The market is pricing in years of above-average growth. If that thesis breaks, downside from multiple compression alone could be 30%+. This is a stock where you're paying for the future, not the present.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
HKD 46M
▲ +124.1% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
HKD 6M
▼ -9.4% YoY
Op. Margin
1.93%
▼ -37.8pp YoY
ROIC
4.96%
▼ -108.5pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-HKD 25M
▼ -410.3% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-HKD 16M
▼ -293.1% YoY
Net Debt
-HKD 9M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
HKD 23M
Continue Research
At a P/E of 99.5, Dreamland (TDIC)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Dreamland scores 52/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Dreamland scores 52 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 1.9% operating margin and a 5.0% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh TDIC's valuation and scores 52/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.