/
Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as such factors may be updated from time to time in our other filings with the SEC. Prior to investing in our common stock, you should read this Annual Report and the documents we have filed as exhibits to this Annual Report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially…
$5.14
+$0.30 (+6.20%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-11.77% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue grew 23.9%, still solid. Margins contracted 2.5pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
ROIC dropped from -30.19% to -69.59%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$17M
▲ +23.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$3M
▼ -283.7% YoY
Op. Margin
-11.77%
▼ -2.5pp YoY
ROIC
-69.59%
▼ -39.4pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$998K
▼ -4755.9% YoY
Net Debt
$1M
Cash & Equiv.
$0.00
Continue Research
Rank One Computing (ROC)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Rank One Computing scores 21/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Rank One Computing scores 21 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 5 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -11.8% operating margin and a -69.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh ROC's valuation and scores 21/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.