FatPipe is a pioneer in enterprise-class, application-aware, secure SD-WAN solutions for organizations, including enterprises, communication service providers, security service providers, government organizations, and other middle-market companies. We strive to be the global leader in delivering leading-edge enterprise-class networking software technology.
$4.54
+$0.00 (+0.00%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
18.69% operating margin is respectable but not wide. ROIC at 10.50%. Suggests the business covers its cost of capital, but doesn't point to a wide moat.
Revenue grew 17.9%, still solid. Margins contracted 2.6pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
Negative free cash flow of -$833K. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
13.0x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$19M
▲ +17.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$5M
▲ +152.7% YoY
Op. Margin
18.69%
▼ -2.6pp YoY
ROIC
10.50%
▼ -1.3pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$833K
▼ -59.0% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$780K
▼ -54.8% YoY
Net Debt
$885K
Cash & Equiv.
$5M
Continue Research
At a P/E of 13.0, Fatpipe (FATN)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Fatpipe scores 23/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Fatpipe scores 23 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 18.7% operating margin and a 10.5% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FATN's valuation and scores 23/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.