OFA Group
OFA Group Class A Ordinary Shares is the equity security representing ownership in OFA Group, a company focused on architectural and interior design services. Through its operating subsidiary, the business provides design, fit-out, and project management solutions for commercial and residential buildings, supporting clients with planning, space utilization, materials selection, and on-site implementation. The company’s services span concept development, detailed drawings, renovation coordination, and installation work, placing it within the broader construction and engineering services market. OFA Group also operates in adjacent technology-related areas, reflecting a business profile that combines traditional built-environment services with digital capabilities. Its shares are used in public markets as the listed Class A ordinary shares of the company and are part of its capital structure alongside Class B shares with different voting rights. The asset is associated with a small-cap business serving property, construction, and development-related customers in Hong Kong and other markets.
$0.36
-$0.01 (-3.23%)
EOD Oct 16, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-1117.26% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue grew 254.9%, still solid. Margins contracted 787.0pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
Negative free cash flow of -$17M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it. Operating margin contracted 787.0pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
Price History
Valuation & Multiples
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$717K
▲ +254.9% YoY
Net Income (FY)
-$8M
▼ -1022.6% YoY
Op. Margin
-1117.26%
▼ -787.0pp YoY
ROIC
-88.41%
▲ +15.2pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (FY)
-$17M
▼ -6488.2% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (FY)
-$4M
▼ -1528.1% YoY
Net Debt
$56K
Cash & Equiv.
$1M
3Y CAGR: -13.3%
Continue Research
Is OFA (OFAL) overvalued?
OFA (OFAL)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, OFA scores 10/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from company filings; read the full methodology, or see how the market compares in our US profitability statistics. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Frequently asked
Is OFA a high-quality business?+
OFA scores 10 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -1,117.3% operating margin and a -88.4% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from company filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Is OFA a good stock to buy right now?+
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh OFAL's valuation and scores 10/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from company filings, not investment advice.
Related stocks: Engineering & Construction
Spot a number that looks wrong?
Data sourced from company filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.