Loading stockRelated stocks: Retail-Apparel & Accessory Stores
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Retail-apparel & accessory stores company · K3 · FY ends Sep · Revenue $14M · -37.47% margin · -$1M FCF
$4.28
$0.14 (-3.17%)
EOD Sep 1, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-37.47% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Negative free cash flow of -$1M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$14M
Net Income (TTM)
-$5M
Op. Margin
-37.47%
ROIC
-47.49%
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$1M
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$1M
Net Debt
-$3M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$5M
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-K filed 16 Jan 2026, covering the period ending 30 Sept 2025, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 17 Apr 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 1 Sept 2026. Fiscal year ends Sep. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
707 Cayman Holdings (JEM)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, 707 Cayman Holdings scores 10/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
707 Cayman Holdings scores 10 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -37.5% operating margin and a -47.5% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh JEM's valuation and scores 10/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.