/
Hut 8: Where Power Unlocks Potential Hut 8 is an energy infrastructure platform that integrates power, digital infrastructure, and compute at scale to fuel next-generation, energy-intensive use cases. We take a power-first, innovation-driven approach to developing, commercializing, and operating the critical infrastructure that underpins the breakthrough technologies of today and tomorrow.
$101.55
+$10.10 (+11.04%)
Live · 05:19 PM
The institution is unprofitable. This typically signals severe credit losses or a business in transition.
Revenue grew 44.8% YoY. However, net income declined 168%, rising credit provisions or expenses may be eating into the top line.
Net income declined 168% YoY, profitability momentum has weakened.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$284M
▲ +44.8% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$312M
▼ -168.1% YoY
Net Margin
-109.77%
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$2.61B
Equity
$1.38B
Total Debt
$18M
Cash & Equiv.
$160M
3Y CAGR: +42.0%
Continue Research
Hut 8 (HUT)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Hut 8 scores 46/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Hut 8 scores 46 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -191.6% operating margin and a -30.5% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh HUT's valuation and scores 46/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.