/
Forum Markets, Incorporated ( formerly ETHZilla Corporation) (the Company , Forum , we , our or us ) is a financial technology company focused on developing infrastructure that supports the origination, financing, and distribution of RWAs through blockchain-enabled capital markets. During 2025 and early 2026, the Company further focused its business model toward building and operating platforms…
$5.68
$0.17 (-2.82%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The institution is unprofitable. This typically signals severe credit losses or a business in transition.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$7M
Net Income (TTM)
-$524M
▼ -3077.2% YoY
Net Margin
—
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$208M
Equity
$168M
Total Debt
$27M
Cash & Equiv.
$98M
Continue Research
Forum Markets (FRMM)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Forum Markets scores 25/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Forum Markets scores 25 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -3,565.8% operating margin and a -51.8% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FRMM's valuation and scores 25/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.