Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Federal & federally-sponsored credit agencies company · FY ends Dec · Revenue $23.28B
$5.51
$0.05 (-0.90%)
EOD Jul 31, 2026
48.82% net margin is above average for a financial institution, suggesting strong underwriting or fee income alongside controlled credit costs.
Revenue declined 6.2% YoY. For a bank, this often signals contracting loan book or reduced fee income.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$23.28B
▼ -6.2% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$11.78B
▼ -9.5% YoY
Net Margin
50.58%
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$3.52T
Equity
$77.77B
Total Debt
$181.73B
Cash & Equiv.
$4.32B
5Y CAGR: +7.6%
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 30 Jul 2026, covering the period ending 30 Jun 2026, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 3 Aug 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 31 Jul 2026. Fiscal year ends Dec. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
Federal Home Loan Mortgage (FMCC)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Federal Home Loan Mortgage scores 69/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a solid business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Federal Home Loan Mortgage scores 69 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a solid business on these measures. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FMCC's valuation and scores 69/100 on quality (solid). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.