Related stocks: Household Furniture
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Related stocks: Household Furniture
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Our Company XMax Inc. (the Company ), formerly known as Nova LifeStyle, Inc. and Stevens Resources, Inc, is a U.S.-headquartered innovative designer and distributor of contemporary styled residential and commercial furniture incorporated into a dynamic marketing and sales platform offering retail as well as online selection and global purchase fulfillment. The Company s products are marketed th…
$8.60
$0.34 (-3.80%)
Price from 9 days ago
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-11.53% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 72.6% YoY with margins expanding 43.8pp.
Negative free cash flow of -$446K. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$16M
▲ +72.6% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$3M
▲ +38.5% YoY
Op. Margin
-14.31%
▲ +43.8pp YoY
ROIC
-7.06%
▲ +110.1pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$765K
▲ +68.3% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$765K
▲ +68.0% YoY
Net Debt
-$4M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$10M
5Y CAGR: +8.1%
Continue Research
XMax (XWIN)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, XMax scores 36/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
XMax scores 36 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -14.3% operating margin and a -7.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh XWIN's valuation and scores 36/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.