/
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars and all references to "common shares" refer to the common shares in our capital stock.
$0.00
+$0.00 (+0.00%)
EOD Sep 15, 2026
Negative free cash flow of -$364K. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue
N/A
Net Income (TTM)
-$627K
▼ -11.9% YoY
Op. Margin
—
ROIC
—
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$222K
▼ -67.9% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$222K
▼ -67.9% YoY
Net Debt
$0.00
Cash & Equiv.
$0.00
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 15 Apr 2025, covering the period ending 28 Feb 2025, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 20 Aug 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 15 Sept 2026. Fiscal year ends May. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
Wolverine Resources (WOLV)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Wolverine Resources scores 0/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Wolverine Resources scores 0 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh WOLV's valuation and scores 0/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.