/
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
These statements often can be identified by the use of terms such as may, will, expect, believe, anticipate, estimate, approximate or continue, or the negative thereof. Company History The Company was incorporated in Nevada on September 27, 1984 as Numeric Two Corporation.
$0.05
+$0.00 (+3.50%)
Price from 2 days ago
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-20.29% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 173.7% YoY with margins expanding 38.4pp.
ROIC dropped from -62.77% to -118.38%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$1M
▲ +173.7% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$939K
▼ -116.3% YoY
Op. Margin
-19.98%
▲ +38.4pp YoY
ROIC
-57.76%
▼ -55.6pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$9K
▲ +81.0% YoY
Net Debt
$350K
Cash & Equiv.
$40K
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 11 Jan 2024, covering the period ending 30 Sept 2016, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 8 Jun 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 31 Aug 2026. Fiscal year ends Dec. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
Southern ITS International (SITS)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Southern ITS International scores 30/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Southern ITS International scores 30 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 5 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -20.0% operating margin and a -57.8% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh SITS's valuation and scores 30/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.