Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
/
Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Once Upon a Farm PBC is a Public Benefit Corporation specializing in organic, farm-fresh baby food pouches, meals, and snacks for children. Founded in 2015 by Cassandra Curtis and Ari Raz, the company expanded with co-founders John Foraker, former Annie’s leader, and actress Jennifer Garner, who brought her family farm into the vision to connect kids to real farming roots. It pioneered the first cold-pressed, high-pressure pasteurized (HPP) products, preserving nutrients and flavors without added sugars, preservatives, or artificial ingredients, revolutionizing childhood nutrition from baby’s first bites to school snacks. As a certified B Corporation since 2017 with an impressive 102.2 B Impact Score—far exceeding the median for ordinary businesses—Once Upon a Farm PBC commits legally to stakeholders, emphasizing environmental sustainability, worker welfare, community engagement, and toxin reduction in food production. Operating in the packaged foods sector, it distributes through over 20,000 retail locations like Target and Whole Foods, plus direct-to-consumer channels, while partnering with organizations like Save the Children to deliver millions of nutritious meals to food-insecure kids and advancing WIC eligibility. Headquartered in Berkeley, California, this purpose-driven brand drives systemic change in kids’ nutrition, supporting organic agriculture, recyclability, and renewable energy initiatives.
$16.27
$1.16 (-6.66%)
Live · 03:57 PM
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-2.37% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Negative free cash flow of -$35M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$241M
Net Income (FY)
-$17M
Op. Margin
-2.37%
ROIC
-7.48%
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (FY)
-$35M
Op. Cash Flow (FY)
-$30M
Net Debt
$49M
Cash & Equiv.
$11M
Continue Research
Once Upon a Farm PBC (OFRM)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Once Upon a Farm PBC scores 0/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Once Upon a Farm PBC scores 0 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -2.4% operating margin and a -7.5% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh OFRM's valuation and scores 0/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.