/
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Opeators of nonresidential buildings company · NY · FY ends Jul · Revenue $21M · -7.74% margin · -$3M FCF
$43.66
+$1.06 (+2.49%)
EOD Sep 1, 2026
The institution is unprofitable. This typically signals severe credit losses or a business in transition.
Revenue growth slowed to 4.1%, essentially flat. This is a business that needs a catalyst.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$21M
▲ +4.1% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$1M
▲ +66.5% YoY
Net Margin
-5.37%
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$90M
Equity
$52M
Total Debt
$31M
Cash & Equiv.
$2M
5Y CAGR: +2.8%
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 11 Jun 2026, covering the period ending 30 Apr 2026, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 12 Jun 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 1 Sept 2026. Fiscal year ends Jul. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
J.W. Mays (MAYS)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, J.W. Mays scores 14/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
J.W. Mays scores 14 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 5 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -7.7% operating margin and a -1.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh MAYS's valuation and scores 14/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.