/
As part of a series of transactions described below, o n February 14, 2024, TPHGreenwich Holdings LLC ( TPHGreenwich ), a previously 100% owned subsidiary of ours, became owned 95% by us, with an affiliate of the lender under our corporate credit facility (the Corporate Credit Facility or CCF ) owning a 5% interest in, and acting as manager of, such entity. The Company s real estate assets and …
$0.02
+$0.00 (+0.00%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
158.19% net margin is above average for a financial institution, suggesting strong underwriting or fee income alongside controlled credit costs.
Revenue declined 89.5% YoY. For a bank, this often signals contracting loan book or reduced fee income.
Financial stocks carry unique risks (credit cycles, regulatory changes, interest rate sensitivity) that aren't captured by standard quality metrics.
0.3x earnings. Below the sector average, the market may be pricing in credit losses or regulatory headwinds, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$4M
▼ -89.5% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$6M
▲ +114.4% YoY
Net Margin
158.19%
P/E
0.3x
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$4M
Equity
$2M
Total Debt
$118K
Cash & Equiv.
$277K
5Y CAGR: -5.2%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 0.3, Trinity Place Holdings (TPHS)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Trinity Place Holdings scores 15/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Trinity Place Holdings scores 15 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -140.5% operating margin and a -3.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh TPHS's valuation and scores 15/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.