/
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing novel therapeutics to treat a wide range of patients with disorders that are linked to dysfunctional signaling of the transforming growth factor-beta, or TGF- , family of proteins. We are a leader in understanding the role of the TGF- family of proteins, which are master regulators of the growth, repair …
$10.65
+$0.00 (+0.05%)
Live · 06:13 PM
27.71% operating margin is above average. ROIC at 13.77%.
Insufficient data to identify specific risks. Treat any missing metrics as a data gap, not a clean bill of health.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$33M
Net Income (TTM)
-$85M
▲ +146.4% YoY
Op. Margin
-337.41%
ROIC
-16.86%
▲ +49.3pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$58M
▲ +165.1% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$57M
▲ +166.8% YoY
Net Debt
-$265M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$281M
Continue Research
Keros Therapeutics (KROS)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Keros Therapeutics scores 20/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Keros Therapeutics scores 20 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -337.4% operating margin and a -16.9% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh KROS's valuation and scores 20/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.