/
Depreciation and amortization expense We incurred depreciation expenses for property and equipment utilized in the operation of our businesses. We incurred amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets, comprising of developed technology, trade names and trademarks, OES trade name and software rights, and right-of-use assets for our finance lease.
$10.44
$0.66 (-5.99%)
Live · 05:20 PM
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-90.01% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 120.8% YoY with margins expanding 145.2pp.
At 50x earnings, the current multiple leaves limited room for execution misses or growth deceleration. Negative free cash flow of -$25M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
49.7x earnings. The market is pricing in years of above-average growth. If that thesis breaks, downside from multiple compression alone could be 30%+. This is a stock where you're paying for the future, not the present.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$19M
▲ +120.8% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$14M
▼ -87.1% YoY
Op. Margin
-3.12%
▲ +145.2pp YoY
ROIC
-1.38%
▲ +5.1pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$28M
▼ -97.1% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$28M
▼ -96.0% YoY
Net Debt
$18M
Cash & Equiv.
$1M
3Y CAGR: -2.3%
Continue Research
A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in .
On quality, Falcon's Beyond Global scores 27/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 0.2%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Falcon's Beyond Global scores 27 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -3.1% operating margin and a -1.4% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, Falcon's Beyond Global pays a regular dividend of about $0.02 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 0.2% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 5.9% of earnings, so the dividend is amply covered by earnings. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For FBYD's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FBYD's valuation and scores 27/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 0.2%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.