We are a global commercial-stage medical technology company focused on creating diagnostic and screening products to identify abnormalities of the GI tract. We develop advanced imaging and AI technologies in creating such products while maximizing the flexibility, convenience, profitability, and safety of patient care.
$6.71
+$0.32 (+5.01%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-188.25% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue grew 15.3%, still solid. Margins contracted 18.8pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
Negative free cash flow of -$23M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it. Operating margin contracted 18.8pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
2.0x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$14M
▲ +15.3% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$27M
▼ -27.2% YoY
Op. Margin
-200.74%
▼ -18.8pp YoY
ROIC
-149.26%
▲ +1008.9pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$24M
▼ -13.4% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$24M
▼ -13.8% YoY
Net Debt
N/A
Cash & Equiv.
N/A
Continue Research
At a P/E of 2.0, CapsoVision (CV)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, CapsoVision scores 25/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
CapsoVision scores 25 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -200.7% operating margin and a -149.3% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh CV's valuation and scores 25/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.