/
We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company pioneering the discovery and development of a new class of RNA-targeting therapeutics with the goal of upregulating gene expression and restoring healthy protein levels to treat a broad range of genetic diseases. Our lead product candidate, CMP-002, has the potential to be the first disease-modifying therapy for the treatment of synaptic Ras GTP…
$3.13
$0.59 (-15.77%)
Live · 05:22 PM
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-1502.43% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 436.5% YoY with margins expanding 6639.9pp.
Negative free cash flow of -$30M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$4M
▲ +436.5% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$86M
▼ -55.2% YoY
Op. Margin
-1335.18%
▲ +6639.9pp YoY
ROIC
-85.20%
▲ +32.1pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$26M
▲ +35.2% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$26M
▲ +35.1% YoY
Net Debt
-$97M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$99M
Continue Research
Camp4 Therapeutics (CAMP)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Camp4 Therapeutics scores 40/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Camp4 Therapeutics scores 40 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -1,335.2% operating margin and a -85.2% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh CAMP's valuation and scores 40/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.