Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
Akoustis Technologies Inc. is a technology company specializing in the design, development, manufacture, and sale of radio frequency (RF) filter products for the wireless industry across the Americas, Asia, Europe, and other international markets. It leverages proprietary bulk acoustic wave (BAW) technology, including its microelectromechanical system (MEMS)-based XBAW manufacturing process, to produce high-performance filters optimized for high power, high frequency, and wide bandwidth applications. The company operates through two primary segments: Fabrication Services, which offers engineering review and backend packaging services, and RF Filters, focused on amplifier and filter product sales. Its solutions serve critical applications in smartphones, tablets, cellular infrastructure equipment, Wi-Fi customer premise equipment, and military and defense systems. Akoustis Technologies Inc. also provides complementary products such as surface acoustic wave resonators, crystal resonators and oscillators, ceramic products, and back-end semiconductor supply chain services. Headquartered in Huntersville, North Carolina, the company plays a specialized role in advancing RF front-end modules for next-generation wireless connectivity.
$23.79
$0.21 (-0.88%)
EOD Aug 13, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-1149.52% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 336.9% YoY with margins expanding 2350.8pp. However, free cash flow softened 719%, worth monitoring whether this is timing or structural.
Free cash flow declined 719% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened. ROIC dropped from -126.77% to -500.89%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$697K
▲ +336.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$76M
▼ -44.9% YoY
Op. Margin
-13207.17%
▲ +2350.8pp YoY
ROIC
-500.89%
▼ -374.1pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$87M
▼ -719.4% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$76M
▼ -473.6% YoY
Net Debt
-$215M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$227M
Continue Research
Akoustis Technologies (AKTS)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Akoustis Technologies scores 20/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Akoustis Technologies scores 20 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -13,207.2% operating margin and a -500.9% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh AKTS's valuation and scores 20/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.