Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
AGM Group Holdings Inc. is a technology company specializing in the research, development, manufacture, and sale of cryptocurrency mining machines and standardized computing equipment primarily in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Mainland China. It focuses on blockchain-oriented ASIC chip design and high-end crypto miner production, alongside technology hardware products. The company also provides financial technology software services, including MetaTrader 5 for future trading solutions and foreign exchange trading systems tailored for financial institutions. As an investment holding company, AGM Group Holdings Inc. engages in these core segments to support computing and fintech needs in key Asian markets. Founded in 2015 and headquartered in Wan Chai, Hong Kong, it operates within the computer hardware industry, contributing to the technology sector's advancements in blockchain and financial software solutions.
$0.99
+$0.01 (+0.92%)
EOD Aug 14, 2026
18.56% operating margin is respectable but not wide. ROIC at 17.07%. Suggests the business covers its cost of capital, but doesn't point to a wide moat.
Revenue declined 53.4% YoY. Margins deteriorated 4.4pp alongside, both lines moving the wrong way.
ROIC dropped from 39.90% to 17.07%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Operating margin contracted 4.4pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
7.6x earnings, 3.3x FCF. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$32M
▼ -53.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$3M
▲ +141.9% YoY
Op. Margin
18.56%
▼ -4.4pp YoY
ROIC
17.07%
▼ -22.8pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
$7M
▲ +520.1% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$7M
▲ +520.4% YoY
Net Debt
-$1M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$1M
3Y CAGR: -4.4%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 7.6 and a price-to-free-cash-flow of 3.3, Agm Group Holdings (AGMH) trades below a two-stage DCF intrinsic value of about $5.19 per share, so at $0.99 the stock looks undervalued (426.4% below estimated intrinsic value). A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Agm Group Holdings scores 67/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a solid business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Intrinsiqq's two-stage DCF estimates an intrinsic value of about $5.19 per share for AGMH, projecting its recent free cash flow forward with a growth rate that fades toward a long-run rate and discounting it back to today. Applying a 25% margin of safety gives a more conservative fair-value entry around $3.89. At today's $0.99, that puts the stock about 426.4% below estimated intrinsic value. The result is sensitive to the growth and discount-rate inputs, so it is best to run conservative, base and optimistic cases. You can adjust all of them yourself with the sliders on the DCF tab.
Agm Group Holdings scores 67 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a solid business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 18.6% operating margin and a 17.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. AGMH currently trades below its estimated intrinsic value and scores 67/100 on quality (solid). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.