Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
TMD Energy Ltd is an investment holding company principally engaged in marine fuel bunkering services, specializing in the supply and marketing of marine gas oil and marine fuel oil, including high sulfur fuel oil, low sulfur fuel oil, and very low sulfur fuel oil, to ships and vessels both in port and at sea. Operating primarily in Malaysia across 19 ports such as Port Klang, Penang Port, and Port of Tanjung Pelepas, it utilizes a fleet of 15 bunkering vessels for ship-to-ship (STS) transfers. The company sources fuels from energy companies, national oil companies, oil traders, and refineries, serving diverse clients including oil and gas firms, shipping companies, logistics providers, charterers, fishing vessels, naval vessels, and cruise ships, as well as offshore structures like rigs and drillships. Complementing its core bunkering operations, TMD Energy Ltd provides ship management services—covering technical management, crewing, marine consultancy, shipping agency, and vessel cleaning—through subsidiaries in Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, Thailand, Indonesia, and Vietnam. It also offers vessel chartering for in-house and external needs. Incorporated in the Cayman Islands in 2023 and headquartered in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, TMD Energy Ltd supports the maritime industry in key routes like the Straits of Malacca and South China Sea as part of the Straits Energy Resources Berhad group.
$0.71
$0.02 (-3.32%)
Live · 04:25 PM · Twelve Data
Operating margin is thin at 0.88%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue grew 8.8%, steady but not accelerating.
Negative free cash flow of -$28M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
8.0x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$689M
▲ +8.8% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$2M
▼ -30.9% YoY
Op. Margin
0.88%
▲ +0.4pp YoY
ROIC
4.78%
▲ +0.3pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$28M
▼ -1023.9% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$25M
▼ -435.2% YoY
Net Debt
$65M
Cash & Equiv.
$16M
Continue Research
At a P/E of 8.0, Tmd Energy (TMDE)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Tmd Energy scores 29/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Tmd Energy scores 29 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 0.9% operating margin and a 4.8% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh TMDE's valuation and scores 29/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.