This competition and competition with approved therapies will reduce the number and types of patients available for clinical trials involving our product candidates, because some patients who might have opted to enroll in our trials may instead opt to pursue a treatment regimen using an approved therapy or enroll in a trial conducted by one of our competitors. Because the number of qualified cl…
$186.16
+$6.98 (+3.90%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
ROIC dropped from -25.25% to -44.57%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Negative free cash flow of -$914M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$0.00
Net Income (TTM)
-$1.37B
▼ -88.5% YoY
Op. Margin
—
ROIC
-60.87%
▼ -19.3pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$1.07B
▼ -60.9% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$1.06B
▼ -61.0% YoY
Net Debt
-$1.75B
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$1.91B
Continue Research
Revolution Medicines (RVMD)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Revolution Medicines scores 10/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Revolution Medicines scores 10 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -60.9% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh RVMD's valuation and scores 10/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.