/
Not financial advice. Analytical data for research only.
Intrinsiqq is a Netherlands-based company operating in Rotterdam, KvK 73238007.
We are a real estate investment trust ( REIT ) that owns and operates a high-quality portfolio of commercial net lease properties all located in the United States. Our properties are primarily leased to industry leading, creditworthy tenants, many of which operate in industries we believe are resistant to the impact of e-commerce.
$19.48
+$0.03 (+0.15%)
EOD Sep 3, 2026
21.70% operating margin is above average. ROIC at 1.57%. Note that capital returns lag the margin, the business may be capital-intensive despite high margins.
Revenue grew 15.9%, still solid. Margins contracted 5.1pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
At 97x earnings, the current multiple leaves limited room for execution misses or growth deceleration. Negative free cash flow of -$219M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
97.4x earnings. The market is pricing in years of above-average growth. If that thesis breaks, downside from multiple compression alone could be 30%+. This is a stock where you're paying for the future, not the present.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$70M
▲ +15.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$7M
▼ -228.6% YoY
Op. Margin
33.93%
▼ -5.1pp YoY
ROIC
2.65%
▼ -0.5pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$207M
▼ -100.7% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$22M
▲ +9.9% YoY
Net Debt
$368M
Cash & Equiv.
$3M
5Y CAGR: +25.8%
Continue Research
SourceComputed from the 10-Q filed 23 Jul 2026, covering the period ending 30 Jun 2026, as reported to the SEC. Data last refreshed 24 Jul 2026. How this is calculated.
Price from market data, last close as of 3 Sept 2026. Fiscal year ends Dec. Sector medians are approximate S&P 500 benchmarks and update periodically.
At a P/E of 97.4, Alpine Income Property Trust (PINE)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Alpine Income Property Trust scores 27/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 5.0%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Alpine Income Property Trust scores 27 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 33.9% operating margin and a 2.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, Alpine Income Property Trust pays a regular dividend of about $0.97 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 5.0% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 271.3% of earnings, so the dividend is stretched at this level. Alpine Income Property Trust has grown the dividend at roughly 9.9% a year over the past few years. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For PINE's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh PINE's valuation and scores 27/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 5.0%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.