/
History of Our Company We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 29, 1998 under the name Weston International Development Corporation to conduct any lawful business, to exercise any lawful purpose and power, and to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Laws of Nevada. On July 28, 1998, its name was changed to Txon…
$0.06
$0.04 (-44.80%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
Margins and capital returns are both well above average: 24.77% operating margin, ROIC at 18.03%. Consistent with durable pricing power, though that alone doesn't make it a buy.
Revenue grew 74.3%, still solid. Margins contracted 50.4pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
Free cash flow declined 311% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened. ROIC dropped from 47.06% to 18.03%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
4.6x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$3M
▲ +74.3% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$3M
▼ -68.3% YoY
Op. Margin
54.62%
▼ -50.4pp YoY
ROIC
7.69%
▼ -29.0pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (FY)
-$394K
▼ -311.0% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$4M
▼ -141.1% YoY
Net Debt
$168K
Cash & Equiv.
$39K
Continue Research
At a P/E of 4.6, Kuber Resources (KUBR)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Kuber Resources scores 20/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Kuber Resources scores 20 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 5 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 54.6% operating margin and a 7.7% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh KUBR's valuation and scores 20/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.