/
Our Company On August 15, 2025, ReShape Lifesciences Inc. (now known as Vyome Holdings, Inc.) (the Company ) completed the merger pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 8, 2024, as amended (the Merger Agreement ), by and among the Company, Raider Lifesciences Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company ( Merger Sub ), and Vyome Therapeutics, Inc. ( Vyome ). Pursuant t…
$2.15
$0.04 (-1.83%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-3269.35% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue grew 24.4%, still solid. Margins contracted 2877.7pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
ROIC dropped from -20.15% to -346.94%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Negative free cash flow of -$4M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
0.0x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$153K
▲ +24.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$11M
▼ -609.0% YoY
Op. Margin
-7453.65%
▼ -2877.7pp YoY
ROIC
-176.69%
▼ -326.8pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$5M
▼ -510.4% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$5M
▼ -510.4% YoY
Net Debt
-$9M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$9M
3Y CAGR: -69.5%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 0.0, Vyome Holdings (HIND)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Vyome Holdings scores 20/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Vyome Holdings scores 20 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -7,453.6% operating margin and a -176.7% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh HIND's valuation and scores 20/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.