Related stocks: Trucking & Courier Services (No Air)
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Related stocks: Trucking & Courier Services (No Air)
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Corporate History and Structure, to JAR Transportation Inc, a California general stock corporation and (ii) after the consummation of the reorganization transactions on October 25, 2024 described in Item 1. Business Corporate History and Structure, to Elite Express Holding Inc., a Delaware corporation and its subsidiary, JAR Transportation Inc, and other subsidiaries if any.
$0.97
+$0.12 (+14.00%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-93.92% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Negative free cash flow of -$3M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$3M
Net Income (TTM)
-$5M
Op. Margin
-178.96%
ROIC
-27.14%
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$7M
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$7M
Net Debt
-$5M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
$5M
Continue Research
Elite Express Holding (ETS)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Elite Express Holding scores 10/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Elite Express Holding scores 10 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -179.0% operating margin and a -27.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh ETS's valuation and scores 10/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.