/
The following is a summary of PPAs as of December 31, 2025: Generating Source Present Capability (MW) (1) Expiration of Contract Hydroelectric Douglas County PUD 16 2028 Grant County PUD 76 2052 Chelan County PUD (2) 263 2045 Columbia Basin Hydro (3) 103 2045 Total Hydroelectric 458 Thermal Lancaster 276 2041 Wind Clearwater Wind 98 2055 Palouse Wind 105 2042 Rattlesnake Flat Wind 144 2040 Tota…
$41.74
$0.06 (-0.14%)
Live · 06:12 PM
18.02% operating margin is respectable but not wide. ROIC at 5.68%. Suggests the business covers its cost of capital, but doesn't point to a wide moat.
Revenue growth slowed to 1.3%, essentially flat. This is a business that needs a catalyst.
Free cash flow declined 10200% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened. Negative free cash flow of -$101M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
16.6x earnings. Valuation is in a reasonable range. The main question is whether the business can re-accelerate or if current trajectory is already priced in.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$1.92B
▲ +1.3% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$206M
▲ +7.2% YoY
Op. Margin
18.94%
▲ +2.2pp YoY
ROIC
8.86%
▲ +0.3pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$153M
▼ -10200.0% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$464M
▼ -12.2% YoY
Net Debt
$459M
Cash & Equiv.
$18M
5Y CAGR: +8.2%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 16.6, Avista (AVA)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in .
On quality, Avista scores 36/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 4.7%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Avista scores 36 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 18.9% operating margin and a 8.9% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, Avista pays a regular dividend of about $1.94 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 4.7% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 77.7% of earnings, so the dividend is covered, with less cushion. Avista has grown the dividend at roughly 7.7% a year over the past few years. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For AVA's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh AVA's valuation and scores 36/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 4.7%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.