Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Bonheur ASA (BONHR.XOSL) pays about NOK 12.13 per share per year, a payout ratio of about 24.7% of earnings, profiling as a dividend payer, with roughly a 3-year payout streak. The figures below are computed from SEC filings; this is analysis, not investment advice.
Yes, Bonheur ASA pays a regular dividend of about NOK 12.13 per share per year, typically in quarterly installments. That is a payout ratio of about 24.7% of earnings, so it is only just covered by free cash flow. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and cash flow cover the payout, not the percentage alone. The full payout history and per-share figures are on this dividends tab.
Bonheur ASA's dividend looks only just covered by free cash flow, with free cash flow covering the payout about 1.1 times over. Intrinsiqq scores its dividend safety at 68 out of 100, weighing the payout ratio, free-cash-flow coverage and balance-sheet strength. Safety matters more than yield: a payout you can rely on beats a high one you cannot.
Bonheur ASA has raised or maintained its dividend for about 3 years in a row. Over the past five years the dividend has grown at roughly 12.7% a year. Consistent growth is one of the strongest signals of a durable, shareholder-friendly business, so read the streak alongside coverage on this tab.
Bonheur ASA pays out about 24.7% of its earnings as dividends. A lower payout ratio leaves more room to keep raising the dividend and to absorb a bad year, while a very high ratio can signal a payout under pressure. On this measure the dividend is only just covered by free cash flow. See the dividend-safety breakdown for the free-cash-flow view, which is often more telling than earnings.