/
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and elsewhere in this Annual Report, including: the impact on our employees, operations, and facilities from the war in Ukraine and the resulting economic and other sanctions imposed on Russia, including the impact on us resulting from the continuation and/or escalation of the war and sanctions against Russi…
$119.15
+$3.32 (+2.87%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
Operating margin is thin at 1.80%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue grew 32.4%, still solid. Free cash flow declined 268% despite revenue growth, conversion is weakening.
At 32x earnings, the current multiple leaves limited room for execution misses or growth deceleration. Free cash flow declined 268% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened.
31.5x earnings. Not cheap, the quality is already reflected in the price. Upside from here requires either margin expansion or growth re-acceleration, not just continuation.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$80.55B
▲ +32.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$683M
▼ -28.2% YoY
Op. Margin
1.60%
▼ -1.2pp YoY
ROIC
3.64%
▼ -3.4pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$1.16B
▼ -267.7% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$588M
▼ -55.6% YoY
Net Debt
$14.59B
Cash & Equiv.
$1.60B
3Y CAGR: +1.5%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 31.5, A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in .
On quality, Bunge Global scores 15/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 2.2%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Bunge Global scores 15 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 1.6% operating margin and a 3.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, Bunge Global pays a regular dividend of about $2.57 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 2.2% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 73.8% of earnings, so the dividend is covered, with less cushion. Bunge Global has grown the dividend at roughly 12.3% a year over the past few years. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For BG's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh BG's valuation and scores 15/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 2.2%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.