/
Although management considers these assumptions reasonable based on information currently available to it, they may prove incorrect. Unless otherwise stated, all financial information contained herein is shown in United States dollars.
$0.03
$0.00 (-12.70%)
EOD Jul 14, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-86.28% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Insufficient data to identify specific risks. Treat any missing metrics as a data gap, not a clean bill of health.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$466K
Net Income (TTM)
-$3M
▲ +62.6% YoY
Op. Margin
-144.54%
ROIC
-205.02%
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (FY)
-$390K
▲ +3.1% YoY
Net Debt
$343K
Cash & Equiv.
$67K
5Y CAGR: +11.2%
Continue Research
Waste Energy (WAST)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Waste Energy scores 15/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Waste Energy scores 15 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 5 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -144.5% operating margin and a -205.0% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh WAST's valuation and scores 15/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.