/
Intermodal containers are large, standardized steel boxes used to transport freight by ship, rail or truck. Because of the handling efficiencies they provide, intermodal containers are the primary means by which many goods and materials are shipped internationally.
$26.04
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Price from 44 days ago
1373.52% operating margin is above average. ROIC at 7.84%. Note that capital returns lag the margin, the business may be capital-intensive despite high margins.
Revenue grew 22.4%, still solid. Margins contracted 326.1pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
ROIC dropped from 11.58% to 7.84%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Operating margin contracted 326.1pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
5.2x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$60M
▲ +22.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$508M
▼ -1.9% YoY
Op. Margin
1373.52%
▼ -326.1pp YoY
ROIC
7.84%
▼ -3.7pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$972M
▼ -12.7% YoY
Net Debt
$6.58B
Cash & Equiv.
$40M
5Y CAGR: -7.1%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 5.2, Triton International (TRTN-PA)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Triton International scores 33/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Triton International scores 33 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 1,373.5% operating margin and a 7.8% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh TRTN-PA's valuation and scores 33/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.