/
Fiscal 2025 Overview and Subsequent Developments During the year ended December 31, 2025, our business consisted of our legacy solar operations conducted through the Subsidiary. Accordingly, references in this Item 1 to the terms Sono Motors, Sono, the Companies, we, our, ours, ourselves, us or similar terms, refer to Sono Group N.V. together with the Subsidiary with respect to the fiscal years…
$3.71
$0.18 (-4.63%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-5167.79% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Negative free cash flow of -$7M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
7.4x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$149K
Net Income (TTM)
$4M
▼ -93.8% YoY
Op. Margin
-5167.79%
ROIC
-1302.57%
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$7M
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$7M
Net Debt
$368K
Cash & Equiv.
$206K
Continue Research
At a P/E of 7.4, Sono Group (SSM)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Sono Group scores 40/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Sono Group scores 40 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -5,167.8% operating margin. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh SSM's valuation and scores 40/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.