Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
/
Loading stockData sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Abrasive, asbestos & misc nonmetallic mineral prods company · D8 · FY ends Dec · Revenue $3M · -346.20% margin · -$4M FCF
$2.96
$0.16 (-5.13%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-346.20% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue grew 84.3%, still solid. Margins contracted 120.3pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
Free cash flow declined 245% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened. ROIC dropped from -19.04% to -33.74%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$3M
▲ +84.3% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$12M
▼ -47.7% YoY
Op. Margin
-346.20%
▼ -120.3pp YoY
ROIC
-33.74%
▼ -14.7pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$4M
▼ -244.7% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$4M
▼ -241.1% YoY
Net Debt
$3M
Cash & Equiv.
$250K
5Y CAGR: -16.6%
Continue Research
Reto Eco-Solutions (RETO)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Reto Eco-Solutions scores 40/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Reto Eco-Solutions scores 40 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 6 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -346.2% operating margin and a -33.7% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh RETO's valuation and scores 40/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.