Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
/
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
NOS Nova AS is a Norwegian clean energy company focused on developing and operating carbon management solutions for industrial emitters. Headquartered in Norway, the company concentrates on carbon capture and storage (CCS) value chains, with an emphasis on providing competitive CO2 storage capacity to Norwegian and wider European industries seeking to reduce their emissions. NOS Nova AS works on technical CO2 infrastructure solutions, leveraging in-house competence, intellectual property, and project development capabilities to enable large-scale, long-term storage of carbon dioxide. Its activities position the company within the broader decarbonization ecosystem, serving hard-to-abate sectors that require access to reliable and regulated storage sites. By collaborating closely with industrial partners and stakeholders, NOS Nova AS plays a role in facilitating the transition toward carbon neutrality across key segments of the European economy.
NOK 0.09
NOK 0.00 (-1.48%)
EOD Jul 1, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-564.93% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 106.2% YoY with margins expanding 2356.0pp.
Negative free cash flow of -NOK 54M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
NOK 8M
▲ +106.2% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-NOK 49M
▲ +55.5% YoY
Op. Margin
-564.93%
▲ +2356.0pp YoY
ROIC
-50.54%
▲ +13.8pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-NOK 54M
▲ +53.0% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-NOK 50M
▲ +45.1% YoY
Net Debt
-NOK 7M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
NOK 17M
Continue Research
NOS Nova AS (NOSN.XOSL)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in .
On quality, NOS Nova AS scores 18/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 536.5%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
NOS Nova AS scores 18 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -564.9% operating margin and a -50.5% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, NOS Nova AS pays a regular dividend of about NOK 0.50 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 536.5% at the current price. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For NOSN.XOSL's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh NOSN.XOSL's valuation and scores 18/100 on quality (lower-quality). It also yields about 536.5%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.