/
Massimo Group is a U.S.-based provider of utility-focused powersports and recreational vehicles, serving rural, agricultural, and commercial customers through a nationwide distribution and service network that enables broad market coverage, efficient product delivery, and ongoing dealer and customer support. Our product portfolio includes utility terrain vehicles ( UTVs ), all-terrain vehicles …
$0.95
$0.03 (-2.86%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
Operating margin is thin at 2.76%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue grew 3680.4%, still solid. Margins contracted 263.0pp, which offsets some of the top-line progress.
Free cash flow declined 103% versus the prior year, cash generation momentum has weakened. ROIC dropped from 18.43% to 4.67%, capital efficiency is deteriorating.
13.6x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$70M
▲ +3680.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$3M
▼ -14.3% YoY
Op. Margin
5.24%
▼ -263.0pp YoY
ROIC
9.26%
▼ -13.8pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (FY)
-$164K
▼ -102.6% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$2M
▼ -101.5% YoY
Net Debt
$3M
Cash & Equiv.
$4M
3Y CAGR: -6.0%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 13.6, Massimo Group (MAMO)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Massimo Group scores 19/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Massimo Group scores 19 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 5.2% operating margin and a 9.3% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh MAMO's valuation and scores 19/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.