/
Regulatory Overview - Legal and Operational Risks The Company is not a Chinese operating company but rather a Nevada holding company with no operations of its own. It conducts its operations through its PRC subsidiary, King Eagle (China), which conducts its operations through contractual agreements with a variable interest entity ( VIE ), King Eagle (Tianjin), and its subsidiaries (i) King Eagl…
$0.23
$0.15 (-39.92%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-123.75% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue declined 30.8% YoY. Margins deteriorated 27.5pp alongside, both lines moving the wrong way.
ROIC dropped from -325.34% to -343.28%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Operating margin contracted 27.5pp YoY, cost discipline may be slipping.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$670K
▼ -30.8% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$1M
▲ +35.9% YoY
Op. Margin
-216.81%
▼ -27.5pp YoY
ROIC
-394.74%
▼ -17.9pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$171K
▼ -1264.2% YoY
Net Debt
$287K
Cash & Equiv.
$20K
5Y CAGR: +11.9%
Continue Research
Kun Peng International Holdings (KPEA)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Kun Peng International Holdings scores 31/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Kun Peng International Holdings scores 31 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 5 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -216.8% operating margin and a -394.7% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh KPEA's valuation and scores 31/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.