/
The Company KLA Corporation and its majority-owned subsidiaries ( KLA or the Company and also referred to as we, our, us or similar references) are suppliers of industry-leading equipment and services that enables innovation throughout the electronics industry. We provide advanced process control and process-enabling solutions for manufacturing wafers, reticles/masks, chemicals/materials, integ…
$212.75
$6.62 (-3.02%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
Margins and capital returns are both well above average: 41.25% operating margin, ROIC at 42.27%. Consistent with durable pricing power, though that alone doesn't make it a buy.
Revenue up 23.9% YoY with margins expanding 4.2pp.
Even for strong businesses, today's 6x P/E means the stock needs to keep delivering. There's no margin of safety if growth disappoints.
6.0x earnings, 7.0x FCF. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$13.10B
▲ +23.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$4.67B
▲ +47.1% YoY
Op. Margin
41.68%
▲ +4.2pp YoY
ROIC
41.79%
▲ +8.8pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
$4.01B
▲ +23.6% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$4.40B
▲ +23.4% YoY
Net Debt
$4.36B
Cash & Equiv.
$1.79B
5Y CAGR: +15.9%
5Y CAGR: +18.2%
Continue Research
At a P/E of 6.0 and a price-to-free-cash-flow of 7.0, KLA (KLAC) trades below a two-stage DCF intrinsic value of about $1,151.02 per share, so at $212.75 the stock looks undervalued (441.0% below estimated intrinsic value). A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, KLA scores 84/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a high-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. It currently yields about 3.6%; see dividend safety for coverage and history. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Intrinsiqq's two-stage DCF estimates an intrinsic value of about $1,151.02 per share for KLAC, projecting its recent free cash flow forward with a growth rate that fades toward a long-run rate and discounting it back to today. Applying a 25% margin of safety gives a more conservative fair-value entry around $863.27. At today's $212.75, that puts the stock about 441.0% below estimated intrinsic value. The result is sensitive to the growth and discount-rate inputs, so it is best to run conservative, base and optimistic cases. You can adjust all of them yourself with the sliders on the DCF tab.
KLA scores 84 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 8 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a high-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 41.7% operating margin and a 41.8% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
Yes, KLA pays a regular dividend of about $7.64 per share per year (typically in quarterly installments), a yield of roughly 3.6% at the current price. That is a payout ratio of about 21.5% of earnings, so the dividend is amply covered by earnings. KLA has grown the dividend at roughly 12.8% a year over the past few years. A low headline yield is not the same as a weak dividend: what matters is how well earnings and free cash flow cover the payout and whether it is growing, not the percentage alone. For KLAC's full payout history, growth streak and dividend-safety score, see the dividends tab.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. KLAC currently trades below its estimated intrinsic value and scores 84/100 on quality (high-quality). It also yields about 3.6%. A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.