Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings and third-party price providers. Scores, valuations, and metrics are algorithmic estimates. This is not investment advice. See our Terms and Methodology.
Gullberg & Jansson AB is a prominent company that primarily operates within the pool and wellness sector. As a producer, importer, and distributor, the company focuses on delivering high-quality pool products including heat pumps, pool covers, and associated pool accessories designed to enhance energy efficiency and reduce operational costs for consumers. In addition, Gullberg & Jansson AB offers comprehensive solutions tailored to both residential and commercial customers, ensuring an innovative and environmentally friendly approach to pool maintenance. The company plays a significant role in the Nordic and European markets by driving advancements in pool technology and sustainability. Headquartered in Sweden, Gullberg & Jansson AB leverages its extensive industry expertise to provide value-driven solutions that cater to evolving market needs.
kr 1.20
+kr 0.04 (+3.45%)
EOD Jun 23, 2026 · Twelve Data
The business is unprofitable at the operating level (-1.47% margin). The thesis depends entirely on whether and when it reaches sustainable profitability.
Revenue up 10.9% YoY with margins expanding 2.3pp.
Insufficient data to identify specific risks. Treat any missing metrics as a data gap, not a clean bill of health.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
kr 260M
▲ +10.9% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-kr 10M
▲ +38.4% YoY
Op. Margin
-12.22%
▲ +2.3pp YoY
ROIC
-2.05%
▲ +2.5pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
kr 13M
▲ +126.9% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
kr 15M
▲ +130.3% YoY
Net Debt
-kr 8M
Net Cash Position
Cash & Equiv.
kr 38M
3Y CAGR: -10.8%
Continue Research
Gullberg & Jansson AB (GJAB.XSTO) trades below a two-stage DCF intrinsic value of about SEK 26.71 per share, so at SEK 1.20 the stock looks undervalued (2,125.9% below estimated intrinsic value). A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Gullberg & Jansson AB scores 46/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a mixed business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full methodology. This is analysis, not investment advice.
Intrinsiqq's two-stage DCF estimates an intrinsic value of about SEK 26.71 per share for GJAB.XSTO, projecting its recent free cash flow forward with a growth rate that fades toward a long-run rate and discounting it back to today. Applying a 25% margin of safety gives a more conservative fair-value entry around SEK 20.03. At today's SEK 1.20, that puts the stock about 2,125.9% below estimated intrinsic value. The result is sensitive to the growth and discount-rate inputs, so it is best to run conservative, base and optimistic cases. You can adjust all of them yourself with the sliders on the DCF tab.
Gullberg & Jansson AB scores 46 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, passing 3 of 7 checks, which makes it a mixed business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -12.2% operating margin and a -2.1% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full check-by-check breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. GJAB.XSTO currently trades below its estimated intrinsic value and scores 46/100 on quality (mixed). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.