/
Land subdividers & developers (no cemeteries) company · NV · Revenue $562K
$0.01
$0.01 (-55.69%)
Price from 3 days ago
The institution is unprofitable. This typically signals severe credit losses or a business in transition.
Revenue grew 52.4% YoY.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$562K
▲ +52.4% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$1M
▼ -37.8% YoY
Net Margin
-191.42%
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$164K
Equity
-$179K
Total Debt
$14K
Cash & Equiv.
$32K
5Y CAGR: +79.4%
Continue Research
Forge Innovation Development (FGNV)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Forge Innovation Development scores 30/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Forge Innovation Development scores 30 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 3 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FGNV's valuation and scores 30/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.