/
The Company refers to our primary operating subsidiary in the U.S., Faraday&Future Inc., as FF U.S. The Company refers to all our subsidiaries organized in China (including Hong Kong) collectively as the PRC Subsidiaries.
$0.13
+$0.01 (+8.06%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
8809.21% operating margin is above average. ROIC at -249.91%. Note that capital returns lag the margin, the business may be capital-intensive despite high margins.
Revenue declined 797.2% YoY. The question is whether this is cyclical or a structural shift.
ROIC dropped from -58.75% to -249.91%, capital efficiency is deteriorating. Negative free cash flow of -$115M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
-$4M
▼ -797.2% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$419M
▼ -9.8% YoY
Op. Margin
8721.30%
▲ +36589.9pp YoY
ROIC
-365.63%
▼ -191.2pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$125M
▼ -48.2% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$92M
▼ -53.3% YoY
Net Debt
$50M
Cash & Equiv.
$12M
Continue Research
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (FFAI)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric scores 10/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric scores 10 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 8,721.3% operating margin and a -365.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh FFAI's valuation and scores 10/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.