/
Camping World Holdings, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries) is America s largest retailer of RVs and related products and services. Through our Camping World and Good Sam brands, our vision is to make it easy for everyone to enjoy RVing and empower our customers joy of travel.
$6.18
$0.36 (-5.50%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
Operating margin is thin at 2.83%. Limited cushion if revenue slows or costs rise, not the profile of a wide-moat business.
Revenue grew 4.3%, steady but not accelerating.
Insufficient data to identify specific risks. Treat any missing metrics as a data gap, not a clean bill of health.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$6.31B
▲ +4.3% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
-$82M
▼ -132.4% YoY
Op. Margin
2.88%
▲ +0.4pp YoY
ROIC
5.29%
▲ +0.8pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF
N/A
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
$35M
▼ -153.8% YoY
Net Debt
$2.22B
Cash & Equiv.
$200M
5Y CAGR: +3.2%
Continue Research
Camping World Holdings (CWH)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Camping World Holdings scores 0/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Camping World Holdings scores 0 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 2.9% operating margin and a 5.3% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh CWH's valuation and scores 0/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.