/
Finance services company · NV · FY ends Dec · -4315.50% margin · -$4M FCF
$0.06
$0.01 (-11.54%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
73227.04% net margin is above average for a financial institution, suggesting strong underwriting or fee income alongside controlled credit costs.
Revenue declined 99.0% YoY. For a bank, this often signals contracting loan book or reduced fee income.
Traditional FCF and operating-margin metrics are not meaningful for financial institutions. Evaluate using net interest margin, credit quality, and capital ratios instead.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (FY)
$6K
▼ -99.0% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$6M
▲ +106.1% YoY
Net Margin
—
P/E
—
Balance Sheet
Total Assets
$24K
Equity
-$41M
Total Debt
$39M
Cash & Equiv.
$24K
5Y CAGR: -60.6%
Continue Research
Cosmos Group Holdings (COSG)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Cosmos Group Holdings scores 15/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard (a lower-quality business on these measures), weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Cosmos Group Holdings scores 15 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 4 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a -4,315.5% operating margin and a -0.4% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh COSG's valuation and scores 15/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.