/
References in this document to we, us, our, the Company, or Bl m are intended to mean Blum Holdings, Inc., individually, or as the context requires, collectively with its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Effective January 12, 2024, Unrivaled Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation and the Company s predecessor ( Unrivaled ), completed a reverse stock split of its Common Stock at a 1-for-100 rat…
$0.17
+$0.00 (+0.00%)
EOD Jul 17, 2026
41.43% operating margin is above average. ROIC at 11.69%.
Revenue up 67.5% YoY with margins expanding 283.8pp.
Negative free cash flow of -$2M. The business is consuming cash, not generating it.
0.3x earnings. The multiple is below average. Either the market is pricing in deterioration you should investigate, or there's genuine value here.
Based on TTM earnings · Diluted shares
Profitability & Returns
Revenue (TTM)
$14M
▲ +67.5% YoY
Net Income (TTM)
$11M
▲ +334.2% YoY
Op. Margin
102.61%
▲ +283.8pp YoY
ROIC
166.58%
▲ +32.9pp YoY
Cash Flow & Balance Sheet
FCF (TTM)
-$2M
▼ -20.2% YoY
Op. Cash Flow (TTM)
-$2M
▼ -57.1% YoY
Net Debt
$10M
Cash & Equiv.
$388K
Continue Research
At a P/E of 0.3, Blum Holdings (BLMH)'s valuation is best read against its own history, its peers, and the growth its price implies. A high multiple is not the same as overvalued: fast-growing, high-quality businesses can deserve a premium. See the general approach in how to tell if a stock is overvalued.
On quality, Blum Holdings scores 35/100 on Intrinsiqq's quality scorecard, weighing growth, margins, returns on capital, share count, and balance-sheet strength. All figures are computed from SEC filings; read the full . This is analysis, not investment advice.
Blum Holdings scores 35 out of 100 on Intrinsiqq's quality score, a weighted blend of 7 metrics each scored 0 to 100, which makes it a lower-quality business on these measures. Recent fundamentals include a 102.6% operating margin and a 166.6% return on invested capital. The score weighs revenue and free-cash-flow growth, operating margins, return on invested capital, share-count change, and balance-sheet strength, all computed from SEC filings, not opinion. Because valuation only means something relative to quality, the full metric-by-metric breakdown is on the quality scorecard.
That depends on valuation and quality together, not either alone. you should weigh BLMH's valuation and scores 35/100 on quality (lower-quality). A cheap price is only a bargain if the business is durable, and a premium can be justified by genuine quality, so the two questions, "is it cheap?" and "is it good?", only make sense side by side. Read the valuation against the quality scorecard, run the DCF on your own assumptions, and decide for yourself. This is analysis from SEC filings, not investment advice.